LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

A Comparison of New Factor Models in the Korean Stock Market

  • Hankil Kang College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Seoul, Korea.
  • Jangkoo Kang Graduate School of Finance & Accounting, College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Seoul, Korea
  • Wooyeon Kim ollege of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Seoul, Korea
We compare empirical performance of the Fama and French (2015) five-factor model, the Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2014) q-factor model, and their variations in the Korean stock market. Among the models considered, we show that the adjusted five-factor model, which includes the quarterly-based profitability factor instead of the yearly-based one, best explains the size, value, investment, and profitability sorted portfolio returns. The adjusted five-factor model outperforms the other factor models in digesting various anomalies in the Korean market.

  • Hankil Kang
  • Jangkoo Kang
  • Wooyeon Kim
We compare empirical performance of the Fama and French (2015) five-factor model, the Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2014) q-factor model, and their variations in the Korean stock market. Among the models considered, we show that the adjusted five-factor model, which includes the quarterly-based profitability factor instead of the yearly-based one, best explains the size, value, investment, and profitability sorted portfolio returns. The adjusted five-factor model outperforms the other factor models in digesting various anomalies in the Korean market.
the Fama-French five-factor model,the Hou-Xue-Zhang four-factor model,crosssectionof stock returns