LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

Who's Leaving Money on the Table? Evidence from IPOs within Business Groups

  • Woojin Kim Seoul National University Business School, Seoul, Korea
  • Chan Lim Seoul National University Business School, Seoul, Korea
  • Tae Jun Yoon Seoul National University Business School, Seoul, Korea.
This paper examines how controlling shareholders of business groups may avoid the cost of IPO underpricing even when they have direct ownership interest. Based on a sample of IPOs made in Korea, we find that sale of secondary shares in general does not reduce underpricing as they do in U.S. However, we do find less underpricing or even overpricing when the offered shares are directly sold by the controlling shareholders. On the other hand, sale of secondary shares held by affiliated firms leads to negative market reaction for the selling firms, implying a direct wealth transfer from shareholders of affiliated firms to IPO subscribers. These finding suggest that minority shareholders in certain affiliated firms, or scapegoats, may bear the cost of underpricing while controlling shareholders of the business group remain effectively protected instead.

  • Woojin Kim
  • Chan Lim
  • Tae Jun Yoon
This paper examines how controlling shareholders of business groups may avoid the cost of IPO underpricing even when they have direct ownership interest. Based on a sample of IPOs made in Korea, we find that sale of secondary shares in general does not reduce underpricing as they do in U.S. However, we do find less underpricing or even overpricing when the offered shares are directly sold by the controlling shareholders. On the other hand, sale of secondary shares held by affiliated firms leads to negative market reaction for the selling firms, implying a direct wealth transfer from shareholders of affiliated firms to IPO subscribers. These finding suggest that minority shareholders in certain affiliated firms, or scapegoats, may bear the cost of underpricing while controlling shareholders of the business group remain effectively protected instead.
IPO,Underpricing,Secondary Shares,Controlling Shareholders,Wealth Transfer,Korea