LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

ȸ°èÁ¤º¸¿Í ½ÃÀåÁ¤º¸¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø¸ðÇüÀÇ Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸

  • ÀÌÀηΠ°í·Á´ëÇб³
  • ±èµ¿Ã¶ °í·Á´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø¸ðÇüÀ» Á¤º¸ÀÇ ¿øõ(information source)À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ȸ°è¸ðÇü, ½ÃÀå¸ðÇü, ±×¸®°í ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ°í ºÐ¼®´ë»ó¸ðÇüÀÇ ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇ¥º»(out-ofsample) ¿¡¼­ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ȸ°è¸ðÇüÀº ºÐ¼®¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó ÆǺ°ºÐ¼®¸ðÇü°ú ·ÎÁþºÐ¼®¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌ ¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¹³»±â¾÷¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ º¯¼ö¸¦ »õ·Ó°Ô ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© º¯¼öÀÇ °è¼ö¸¦ ÀçÃßÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÃÀå¸ðÇüÀº ºÎµµ°Å¸®(Distance to Default; DD)¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ȸ°èÁ¤º¸¿Í ½ÃÀåÁ¤º¸¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇüÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹®Çå¿¡¼­ ¹Ì±¹±â¾÷¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼±Á¤µÈ º¯¼ö¸¦ ±¹³»±â¾÷¿¡ ±×´ë·Î Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© º¯¼öÀÇ °è¼ö¸¸À» ÀçÃßÁ¤ÇÑ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇü°ú ±¹³»±â¾÷¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇϵµ·Ï ¸ðÇüÀ» ¼öÁ¤ÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ 5°³ÀÇ ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø¸ðÇüÀÇ ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀ» ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À§ 5°³ ¸ðÇüÀÇ ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀº ºÎµµÀûÁß·ü(hit-ratio), ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) °î¼±À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Æò°¡¹æ¹ý, ±×¸®°í ºÐ¼®´ë»ó¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ »êÃâµÈ °ª°ú ÃßÈÄ ½ÇÁ¦ ±â¾÷ºÎµµ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ Æгκм®ÇÑ Á¤º¸°ËÁõ¹ý(information content test), ÀÌ ¼¼°¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ ¼¼°¡Áö Æò°¡¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­ ÀÏ°üµÇ°Ô ±¹³»±â¾÷¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇϵµ·Ï ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¸ðÇüÀ» ¼öÁ¤ÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇüÀÌ °¡Àå ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀÌ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¹Ì±¹±â¾÷¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼±Á¤µÈ º¯¼ö¸¦ ±¹³»±â¾÷¿¡ ±×´ë·Î Àû¿ëÇÑ ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇü, ·ÎÁþºÐ¼®¸ðÇü, ÆǺ°ºÐ¼®¸ðÇü, ±×¸®°í DD¸ðÇü¼øÀ¸·Î ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇüÀ» ±¹³»±â¾÷ÀÇ ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î Á¦¾ÈÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø¸ðÇü,ȸ°è¸ðÇü,½ÃÀå¸ðÇü,ÇìÀúµå¸ðÇü,ºÎµµ¿¹Ãø·Â Æò°¡

Evaluation of bankruptcy prediction model, using both accounting and market information, in Korea

  • Inro Lee
  • Dongcheol Kim
This paper evaluates out-of-sample prediction power of bankruptcy prediction models, accounting-based model, market-based model, and hazard model using both accounting and market information. We suggest two new accounting-based models by using multivariate discriminant analysis and logit analysis. Merton(1974)¡¯s distance-to-default(DD) model is employed as market-based-model. We also provide two hazard models. One is obtained by re-estimating coefficients of frequently used U.S. hazard model with Korean data. The other hazard model is built by modifying aforementioned hazard model for Korean firms. Therefore, we compare the predictability of these five bankruptcy prediction models. We assess the performance of these models by calculating hit-ratio, drawing ROC(receiver operating characteristic) curve, and analyzing information contents test. All three different approaches show that modified hazard model for Korean firms is superior to the others. Therefore, we recommend our modified hazard model for Korean firms as a bankruptcy prediction model.
Bankruptcy prediction model,Accounting-based model,Market-based model,Hazard model,Evaluation of the out-of-sample prediction power