LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

Effects of the Fat-Tail Distribution on the Relationship between Prospect Theory Value and Expected Return

  • Cheoljun EOM School of Business, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Rep. of Korea
  • Jong Won PARK College of Business Administration, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Rep. of Korea
This study investigates the negative relationship between prospect theory value and expected return considering the fat-tail property of the return distribution. The results of both decile portfolio and crosssectional regression show evidence supporting the hypothesis related to prospect theory value. However, these results are very sensitive to whether the model includes a short-term reversal factor. In the empirical design combining the hypothesis with the degree of fat-tail of the return distribution, stock groups with the fat-tail return distribution definitely show that prospect theory value has a significant information value for explaining expected return, regardless of whether the short-term reversal and other factors are included in the models. These results suggest that both the fat-tail property in the stock return distribution and the property of the skewed return distribution must be considered in examining the relationship between prospect theory value and expected return. Furthermore, our findings on the effects of the fat-tail property of the return distribution are verified through robustness testing while considering changes in empirical design and using out-of-sample stock markets of the U.S., Japan, and China, as well as the in-sample Korean stock market.

  • Cheoljun EOM
  • Jong Won PARK
This study investigates the negative relationship between prospect theory value and expected return considering the fat-tail property of the return distribution. The results of both decile portfolio and crosssectional regression show evidence supporting the hypothesis related to prospect theory value. However, these results are very sensitive to whether the model includes a short-term reversal factor. In the empirical design combining the hypothesis with the degree of fat-tail of the return distribution, stock groups with the fat-tail return distribution definitely show that prospect theory value has a significant information value for explaining expected return, regardless of whether the short-term reversal and other factors are included in the models. These results suggest that both the fat-tail property in the stock return distribution and the property of the skewed return distribution must be considered in examining the relationship between prospect theory value and expected return. Furthermore, our findings on the effects of the fat-tail property of the return distribution are verified through robustness testing while considering changes in empirical design and using out-of-sample stock markets of the U.S., Japan, and China, as well as the in-sample Korean stock market.
Prospect theory value,Decision weight,Skewed distribution,Fat-tail distribution,Out- ofsample test.