LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

°¡°ÝÁ¦ÇÑÆøÀÌ ²¿¸®À§Çè¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

  • ¿À¼¼°æ °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ ±³¼ö
  • ±âÇõµµ °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ °æ¿µÇаú ¹Ú»ç°úÁ¤, ¸¶ÀϽºÅæÀÚ»ê¿î¿ë
º» ¿¬±¸´Â À§ÇèÁöÇ¥·Î¼­ÀÇ ²¿¸®À§Çè°ú °¡°ÝÅëÁ¦ÀåÄ¡·Î¼­ÀÇ °¡°ÝÁ¦ÇÑÆøÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ Á¶¸íÇÏ°í ±â¾÷±Ô¸ð¿Í °Å·¡¼Ò À¯ÇüÀÌ ²¿¸®À§ÇèÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ ÁÖ½Ä ¼öÀÍ·ü ¿¹Ãø·Â¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´ÂÁö ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÁֽĽÃÀåÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½ÇÁõ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ºÐ¼® °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ²¿¸®À§ÇèÀº °¡°ÝÁ¦ÇÑÆøÀÌ 12% ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î È®´ëµÈ ÀÌÈĺÎÅÍ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ ÁÖ½Ä ¼öÀÍ·ü ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀ» °¡Áö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µÑ°, ±Ô¸ð°¡ ÀÛÀº ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æ¿ì ²¿¸®À§ÇèÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ°¡ Àå±â°£¿¡ °ÉÃÄ Áö¼ÓµÇ°í ½Ã°£ÀÌ È带¼ö·Ï ¿µÇâ·ÂÀÌ Ä¿Áö´Â ¹Ý¸é, ±â¾÷ ±Ô¸ð°¡ Å« °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ²¿¸®À§ÇèÀÌ ´Ü±â°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¼³¸íº¯¼ö°¡ µÇÁö¸¸ Àå±âÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ¿µÇâ·ÂÀÌ ¾àÇØÁüÀ» ¹ß°ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Â°, ±Ô¸ð°¡ Å« ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æ¿ì ±Ô¸ð°¡ ÀÛÀº ±â¾÷¿¡ ºñÇØ °¡°ÝÁ¦ÇÑÆøÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ´ú ¹Þ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ³Ý°, À¯°¡Áõ±Ç½ÃÀå¿¡¼­´Â ²¿¸®À§ÇèÀÇ ÁÖ½Ä ¼öÀÍ·ü ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀÌ ´Ü±âÀÇ ¿¹Ãø±â°£¿¡¼­ Åë°èÀû À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³­ ¹Ý¸é, ÄÚ½º´Ú½ÃÀå¿¡¼­´Â ÁÖ°¡ ¼öÀÍ·ü ¿¹Ãø·ÂÀÌ Àå±â¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ²¿¸®À§ÇèÀÇ ÁÖ°¡ ¹Î°¨µµµµ Å©´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¹ß°ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´Ù¼¸Â°, ²¿¸®À§Çè ±â´ë°ª¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Î°¨µµ ºÐ¼® °á°ú°¡ »óÇÏÇÑ°¡¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °¡°Ý ¿Ö°îÇö»óÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­Çϸ鼭 ÁÖ°¡ÀÇ ±Þº¯µ¿À» ¾ïÁ¦ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â Á¤Ã¥ ¸ñÀûÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇÏ°íÀÚ Çϴµ¥ º¸Á¶ÀûÀÎ È°¿ëÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
²¿¸®À§Çè,°¡°ÝÁ¦ÇÑÆø,¼öÀÍ·ü ¿¹Ãø·Â,¿Öµµ(skewness),±Ô¸ðÈ¿°ú

Impact of Price Limits on Tail Risk

  • Sekyung Oh
  • Hyukdo Kee
This study analyzes the relationship between tail risk as a risk indicator and price limits as a price control system. We investigate the impact of price limits on tail risk and examine the predictive power of tail risk on future stock returns. We use the measure of tail risk proposed by Kelly and Jiang (2014), which is based on the commonality inherent in the tail risk of individual stocks and is useful for capturing the common factors associated with tail risk at each time point. We analyze the sensitivity of Oh, Park, and Kee¡¯s (2017) expected value model of tail risk under price limits and simulate the random returns under various price limit conditions. The sensitivity analysis for the expected value model of tail risk shows that the tail risk is underestimated when the price limits are tight. The sensitivity results can also be supplemented to find the appropriate price limits needed to achieve the policy objectives of mitigating the extreme fluctuation of stock prices and minimizing the price distortions caused by the upper and lower limits. We then examine these findings using a simulation of 50,000 random returns with leptokurtic distribution. The tail risk measured suggests that the tail risk is underestimated as the price limit becomes increasingly tight. However, with a well-expanded price limit, the tail risk based on leptokurtic distribution is estimated to be about 20% to 30% higher than that based on the standard normal distribution and the negative impact of the price limit on tail risk is generally attenuated after a price limit greater than 12% is applied. The price limit system, which limits the range of prices within which stocks are allowed to be traded, restricts the intrinsic fluctuation demand of the stock market and is believed to have a significant impact on tail risk. Price limit systems have been implemented in many Asian countries such as Japan and China, which are the third and fourth in the world in terms of stock market capitalization, and Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, and Taiwan. Our empirical analysis focuses on the Korean stock market because the price limit has been gradually eased from an average of 4.6% to the current 30%. Our sample covers trading on the Korean stock market from January 1990 to October 2015. We find that the tail risk during the period with the price limit of 12% or more increases more than twice compared to that of previous period. We interpret this as reflecting the inherent nature of the tail risk associated with stock movements without being subject to the artificial control of the price limit. We separately analyze the predictive power of tail risk in the KOSPI and KOSDAQ markets and examine the effect of firm size on the predictive power of tail risk for future Korean stock returns. Our main empirical results are as follows. First, among groups of the same firm size, the coefficient of tail risk increases as the forecasting period becomes longer, which means that the sensitivity to tail risk persists over a long period. Second, when examining the size effect in relation to the forecasting period, we find that in the short term, the sensitivity of tail risk increases as the firm size increases whereas for longer forecasting periods, the sensitivity diminishes as the firm size increases. Third, in the largest firm size group, we find statistically significant predictive power in the short-term forecasting period for the whole sample period. We find that the stock returns of large firms are less affected by price limits than those of small firms. Fourth, in all of the forecasting periods for the KOSDAQ market and in the short-term period of the KOSPI market, the tail risk has statistically significant predictive power on future stock returns. In the KOSDAQ market, the longer the forecasting period, the more significant the predictive power and the more sensitive the tail risk. In contrast, in the KOSPI market, the tail risk is only found to have predictive power in a less than one year forecasting period and the sensitivity of the tail risk is lower than that of the KOSDAQ market. Fifth, by estimating the predictive power of tail risk on the future skewness, we find that the coefficients of tail risk have negative values for all forecasting periods and Newey West t-statistics are sufficiently high. This confirms that the two variables share the same dynamics and the tail risk is closely related to the left-skewed distribution.
Tail Risk,Price Limit,Predictive Power,Skewness,Size Effect