LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

ELS ½ÃÀåÀÇ ±ÝÀ¶Çõ½ÅÀÚ ÀÌÀÍ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

  • ÁöÇöÁØ Çѱ¹ÅõÀÚÁõ±Ç ÅõÀÚ°øÇкÎ
  • ¾ö¿µÈ£ ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ ±³¼ö
  • Àå¿î¿í ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Á¤°æ´ëÇÐ ±³¼ö
Çѱ¹¿¡¼­ ÁÖ°¡¿¬°èÁõ±Ç(equity linked securities, ELS) ½ÃÀåÀº 2003³â¿¡ óÀ½ °³¼³ µÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Çѱ¹ÀÇ ELS ½ÃÀå¿¡ ÃÖÃÊ·Î ÁøÀÔÇÏ¿© »õ·Î¿î »óÇ°À» °³¹ßÇÏ´Â ±ÝÀ¶±â°üÀ» Çõ½ÅÀÚ·Î ÀνÄÇÏ¿© Àüü ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ Çõ½ÅÀÚ°¡ ÈĹßÀÚ¿¡ ºñÇØ ¾î¶°ÇÑ ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ÀÌÀÍÀ» ¾ò´ÂÁö »ìÆ캸¾Ò´Ù. ±ÝÀ¶Çõ½Å¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼±Ç࿬±¸µéÀº ±ÝÀ¶»óÇ°Àº ƯÇã±Ç(patent) µîÀ» ÅëÇØ º¸È£µÇÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç ÈĹßÀÚ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½±°Ô ¸ð¹æÀÌ ÀÌ·ïÁö±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Çõ½ÅÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Ãʱâ ÀÌÀͺ¸´Ù´Â ½ÃÀåÁ¡À¯À²À» ³ôÀÌ´Â ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î ÀÌÀÍÀ» Ãß±¸ÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù°í º¸°í ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ELS ½ÃÀå ÀڷḦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î »óÇ°ÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû Ư¼º ¹× ÆǸÅÀ¯ÇüÀ» ÅëÁ¦ÇÏ°í ÁøÇàÇÑ ½ÇÁõºÐ¼®°á°ú Çõ½ÅÀÚ°¡ ÈĹßÀÚ¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ôÀº ¹ßÇà ÀÌÀÍÀ» Ãß±¸ÇÏ¿´À½À» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ ELS ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀÚÀÇ ÀÌÀÍÃß±¸¹æ½ÄÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â °ÍÀº ½ÃÀå ÁøÀÔ¿¡ Á¦¾àÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú±â ¶§¹®À¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. ½ÃÀå ÁøÀÔÀ庮Àº Çõ½ÅÀÚ°¡ ±ÝÀ¶Çõ½ÅÀ» ÅëÇØ ´ÜÀ§´ç ¼öÀÍÀ» ³ôÀÌ´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ÀÌÀÍÀ» ±Ø´ëÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿©°ÇÀ» Á¦°øÇØ ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ELS ½ÃÀå ÃʱâÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀÚµéÀÇ ³ôÀº ¹ßÇà¼öÀÍ Ãß±¸´Â ±¹³» ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ Áõ±Ç»ç°¡ ÈĹßÀÚ·Î ÁøÀÔÇÑ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡µµ °è¼ÓµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀÚµéÀº °ø¸ðº¸´Ù´Â »ç¸ð·Î ELS¸¦ ÆǸÅÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì ´õ ³ôÀº ¹ßÇàÀÌÀÍÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ½À» ¹àÈú ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
ÁÖ°¡¿¬°è»óÇ°,ÁÖ°¡¿¬°è¿¹±Ý,ÁÖ°¡¿¬°èÁõ±Ç,±ÝÀ¶Çõ½Å,½ÃÀåÁ¡À¯À²

On the Profits of the Financial Innovators : The Case of Korea ELS Markets

  • Hyun Jun Ji
  • Young Ho Eom
  • Woon Wook Jang
By the name of financial innovations, a large number of new financial products related to derivatives have been introduced into the global financial market for the last few decades. The Korean financial market was not an exception to this development. Among new financial products in Korea, the Equity-Linked Securities (hereafter ELS) may be considered one of the most successful products, judging from its market size. Since it was first introduced in 2002, the ELS have been very popular to individual investors who were cautious of downside risk of their investments. The ELS provided them with new tools to manage their future wealth. Therefore, the ELS can be thought as a good example of financial innovations in the Korean financial market. It is broadly accepted that financial innovations are originated by market imperfections, whereas there have been two competing theories about what drives financial institutions to invent new products. Because, unlike innovations in other industries, new products in financial industry are not protected by the patent law and should be disclosed publicly, financial innovations may have some different features from those in other industries. For instance, one could argue that that the benefit to financial innovator is not an excess profit. Bhattacharyya and Nanda (2000) assumed that the imitation occurred immediately in the financial market, so they suggested that an innovator made an effort to increase the market share rather than to take excess profits. Herrera and Schroth (2003) also agreed that financial innovators could notmake more profits than imitators could. Moreover, they thought that the information about potential clients was the main source for innovators to be able to increase their market shares. These theories were supported by the empirical research of Tufano (1989). He tested this hypothesis with data related to corporate securities and MBS (Mortgage-Backed Securities) and found that financial innovators could not impose higher margin, while they could extend their market shares. In contrast, Van Horne (1985) argued that financial innovators could take profits before imitators appeared even though there was no legal protection in the financial market. His theory was based on the traditional monopoly theory and it was empirically supported by Carrow (1999) and Schroth (2002). Carrow (1999) found that innovator¡¯s profit decreased as more rivals came into the market and Schroth (2002) reported that the source of innovator¡¯s excess margin was the superior knowledge about a new product. Using 4,521 issuance data during the early stage of ELS market in Korea, this paper empirically examines whether first movers, or innovators, earn more profits than imitators do. We also test whether the profit of innovators declines as the time passes by. As a proxy for profit, we estimate the total margin of ELS, the difference between the actual issue price and the theoretical price of ELS divided by the actual issue price. This measure represents the proportion of issuer¡¯s margin to the total price of ELS and it gives us the information about how much innovators charge on different products. In creating new products, the characteristics of embedded option in ELS are at the issuer¡¯s discretion and the issuer¡¯s profit is mainly determined by how the embedded option component is valued. Thus, for the robustness of our empirical results, we also estimate the margin of embedded option in ELS, the difference of the value of the embedded option in ELS and its theoretical value divided by the value of embedded option. Then we perform regression analysis with the total margin or the option margin as a dependent variable. To control the effects of hedging costs, we also use the product type, the number of underlying asset type, the maturity, and the embedded option type, and issue type (private/public issue) for controlling variables. The empirical results show that innovators in the ELS market could earn more margin than imitators do. These results are inconsistent with the theory of Bhattacharyya and Nanda (2000). However, margins decline as the market becomes more competitive. The results also show that the large sized financial institutions innovate more frequently and earn higher margins than lower sized firms do. Our empirical results have important implications for regulatory policy regarding entry barrier. To issue the ELS in the Korean market, securities firms should get permission from the regulatory authority. Therefore, in the Korean ELS market, innovators protected by the regulatory barrier could have taken excess profits, despite of the fact that some competitors exist in the market. Moreover, they can maintain their margin policies after competitors come in. The regulation of Korean ELS market was aimed to protect investors from issuers¡¯ insolvency. However, it resulted in protecting first-movers from followers as well. As a consequence, innovators in the ELS market become superior to imitators, which prevent a fair competition. In the future, the regulation authority should consider both the investor protection and the market competition.
Equity-linked products,Equity Linked Deposits,Equity Linked Security,Financial Innovations,Market Share