LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

±â¾÷Áý´Ü(Àç¹ú)ÀÇ È¿À²¼º°ú ÁÖÁÖ ºÎÀÇ ±Ø´ëÈ­ : ½ÅÁÖ¹ßÇàÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

  • °­Áر¸ ¹Ì½Ã°£ÁÖÈû´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ ¼®Á±³¼ö
  • ¹éÀç½Â ÆòÆÑ´ëÇб³ °æ½ÌÁ¤º¸ÇкÎ
º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â Àç¹ú¿¡ ¼ÓÇÑ °è¿­±â¿±°£ÀÇ ºÎÀÇ ÀÌÀüÇö»ó(tunneling)°ú À§Çè°øÀ¯/»ó È£Áö¿øÇö»ó(propping) À» ÁÖÁÖ¹èÁ¤ÀÇ À¯»óÁõÀÚ °ø½ÃÈ¿°ú¸¦ µ¿ÇØ »ìÆ캸¾Ò´Ù. Àç¹ú¼Ò¼Ó ºÒ·®°è¿­±â¾÷ÀÌ ±¸ÁÖÁÖ¹èÁ¤À± ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÁÖ½ÄÀ» ¹ßÇàÇÑ °æ¿ì ´çÇØ ¹ßÇà±â¿±ÀÇ CAR (-1, 1) Àº À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¾ç(ä¨)ÀÇ °ªÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç£¬ ¹Ì¹ßÇà¿ì·®°è¿°±â¾÷ Æ÷Æ®Æú¶ó¿À ºñÁ¤»óÁÖ°¡ ¼öÀÍ·ü(-1, 1)°ú´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ À½(-)ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. À̶óÇÑ °á°ú´Â ¸¶¹ßÇà¿ì·®°è¿­ ±â¿±ÀÌ ºÒ·®°è¿­±â¿±ÀÇ À¯»óÁõÀÚ¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ¿© ºÒ·®°è¿­±â¾÷À» Áö¿øÇÏ°í ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ¹Ì ¹ßÇà¿ì·®°è¿­±â¿±À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ºÒ·®¹ßÇà±â¿±À¸·Î ºÎÀÇ ÀÌÀüÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǸ¶ÇÑ ´Ù ÀÌ¿Í´Â ´Þ¶ó ¹ßÇà±â¿±ÀÌ ºÒ·®±â¿±ÀÌ°í ¹Ì¹ßÇà±â¿±ÀÌ ¿ì·®±â¾÷ÀÎ °æ¿ì¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ±âŸǥº»¿¡¼­´Â ¹ßÇà±â¿±ÀÇ CAR(-1, 1) °ú ¹Ì¹ßÇà°è¿­±â¾÷ Æ÷Æ®Æú¶ó¿À ºñÁ¤»óÁÖ°¡¼ö ÀÍ·ü (-1, 1) °£¿¡´Â ¾ç(+)ÀÇ °ü°è°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú´Â »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ì·®ÇÑ Àç º§±â¿±ÀÇ ÁֽĹßÇàÀÌ °°Àº Àç¹ú¿¡ ¼ÓÇÑ ´Ù¸¥ ºñ¿ì·® °è¿­±â¿±ÀÇ ÁÖ°¡¿¡ ±àÁ¤Àû ¿µÇâ À» ¹ÌÄ£´Ù´Â »ç½ÇÀ» ÀǹÌÇÏ¸ç °è¿­±â¿±°£ÀÇ À§Çè°øÀ¯/»óÈ£Áö¿ø°¡¼³À» ÁöÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸ ·Î Çؼ®ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ Àç¹ú±â¾÷ÀÇ ÁֽĹßÇà °ø½ÃÈ¿°ú¿¡ ºÎÀÇ ÀÌÀü Çö»ó°ú À§Çè°øÀ¯/»óÈ£Áö¿ø Çö»óÀÌ °øÁ¸ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù´Â »ç»ìÀº ¿ì¶ó³ª¶ó Àç¹úÀÌ ¿ª±â´É°ú ¼ø±â ´ÉÀ± µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¼öÇàÇÏ´Â ±â¿±Áý´ÜüÁ¦¶ó´Â °ÍÀ» ½Ã»çÇÑ´Ù.
Àç¹ú,ºÎÀÇ ÀÌÀü(tunneling),À§Çè°øÀ¯/»óÈ£Áö¿ø (propping),ÁÖÁÖ¹è Á¤À¯ »óÁõÀÚ,ºñÁ¤»óÁÖ°¡¼öÀÍ·ü

The Efficiency of Business Group(Chaebol) and Shareholder Wealth Maximization : An Analysis of Equity Issues

  • Jun-Koo Kang
  • Jae-Seung Baek
Using a large sample of rights offerings by firms belonging to top 30 Korean business groups (chaebols) during the 1987-1999 period, we examine tunneling/propping effects within affiliated firms , We find that the announcement return of rights offerings by a poorly performing chaebol-affiliated firm is significant and positive and that its return is significantly and negatively related to the abnormal return for the value-weighted portfolio of other non-issuing firms in the same group. These findings support the tunneling view for chaebols In contrast, other cases show significant and positive return relations between issuing firms and non-issuing firms in the same group, supporting the propping view for chaebols. Taken together, our results suggest that there is propping alongside tunneling within chaebols.