LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

Archive

±¹³» ÁÖ½ÄÇü ¹ÂÃß¾óÆݵåÀÇ ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ, ¼º°ú ¹× ½ÃÀ忹Ãø ´É·Â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÐ¼®

  • À¯½ÅÀÍ °í·Á´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ ¹Ú»ç°úÁ¤
  • ±èµ¿Ã¶ °í·Á´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ ±³¼ö
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ä±Ç½ÃÀå ¿äÀÎÀÌ Æ÷ÇÔµÈ Fama-French(1993) 5¿äÀÎ ¸ðÇüÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¹³» ÁÖ½ÄÇüÆݵåÀÇ ½ºÅ¸ÀϺм®, ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼º°úºÐ¼®, Æݵå¸Å´ÏÀúÀÇ ½ÃÀ忹Ãø´É·Â, ½ºÅ¸ÀÏÀÇ Áö¼Ó¼º°ú Æݵ强°ú °£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³í¹®ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ½ÇÁõºÐ¼® °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, 2001³âºÎÅÍ 2009³â±îÁö »ýÁ¸ÇÑ ÆݵåÀÇ ¼öÀÍ·üÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÃßÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, Fama-French 5¿äÀÎ ¸ðÇüÀº ´Ù¸¥ ¸ðÇü¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ôÀº ÀûÇÕµµ¿Í ³·Àº ÃßÀû¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»°í, Fama-French 5¿äÀÎ ¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ ä±Ç½ÃÀå¿äÀÎÀº ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·ü ¼³¸í¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÑ°, ±¹³» ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ´ëÇü ¹× ¼ºÀåÇü ÆݵåÀÇ ¼öÀÍ·üÀÌ ¼ÒÇü ¹× °¡Ä¡Çü¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ô°í, Æò±Õ ÀÚ±ÝÈ帧 ±Ô¸ðµµ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼Â°, ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ±¹³» Æݵå´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿©, °¡Ä¡Çü, ´ëÇü, °æ±â¹Î°¨Çü ¹× °í½Å¿ëÇü Àü·«¿¡ ÁýÁßÇÏ´Â °ø°ÝÀû ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ Æ¯¼ºÀ» Áö´Ï´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î È®ÀεǾú´Ù. ³Ý°, ±¹³» ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ÃÊ°ú¼öÀÍ·üÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â Æݵ尡 ÀϺΠÁ¸ÀçÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ½ÃÀ忹Ãø´É·ÂÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â Æݵå´Â ¸Å¿ì Àû¾ú´Ù. ´Ù¼¸Â°, ¿ì¼öÇÑ ÃÊ°ú¼öÀÍ·üÀ» º¸ÀÎ ¼ºÀåÇü ¹× ´ëÇü ÆݵåÀÇ ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ Áö¼Ó¼ºÀº °¡Ä¡Çü ¹× ¼ÒÇü Æݵ庸´Ù ³ôÀº °ÍÀ» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¿©¼¸Â°, ±¹³» ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ÀÚ±ÝÈ帧 Áõ´ë·Î ÆÝµå ¼º°ú °³¼±µÇ´Â ¡®½º¸¶Æ® ¸Ó´Ï È¿°ú¡¯°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö¸¸, µ¿ È¿°úÀÇ Áö¼Ó±â°£Àº 3³â ÀüÈÄ¿¡ ±¹ÇѵǴ °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù.
ÆÝµå ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ,Fama-French 5¿äÀÎ ¸ðÇü,ÃÊ°ú¼öÀÍ·ü,Æݵ强°ú Áö¼Ó¼º,½º¸¶Æ® ¸Ó´Ï È¿°ú

Style, Performance, Market Timing of Equity Mutual Funds in Korea

  • Shin Ik Yoo
  • Dongcheol Kim
Since the introduction of the Act of Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets in 2009, the fund markets in Korea have enormously grown. In this study, we examine three salient composites: fund style, performance persistency, and market timing ability of fund managers. To this end we use all equity funds survived during the period of 2001 through 2009 (all 139 funds). In addition, we look into the relation between the persistency of fund style and the fund performance. We also study how the fund performance has been changed since the financial crisis in 2007. To classify fund styles and examine fund performance, we use a return-based style analysis as in Sharpe (1992). The return-based style analysis sort funds according to the magnitude of the coefficient estimates. Unlike Sharpe who uses simply a regression model comprised of several indexes, we use the Fama-French (1993) five-factor model composed of three equity factors and two bond market factors. The equity factors are the market factor and two factors related to size and book-to-market, namely SMB and HML, respectively; the bond market factors are term spread and default spread. The spread in yields between 5-year Korean Treasury Bonds (KTB) and 91-day Certificate of Deposit (CD) is used as term spread, and the spread in yields between BBB3-rated and AA3-rated corporate bonds is used as default spread. The reason we select the Fama-French 3 factor model to analyze equity funds in Korea is that, as recently reported by Kim, Kim, and Shin (2012), the Fama-French 3 factor model explains Korean stock returns best among many factor models considered. Our paper is the first paper that uses the bond market factors in analyzing equity mutual funds in Korea. Following Sharpe (1992), we classify fund style according to the estimated coefficients (or factor loadings) on each of the five factors. For example, if the magnitude of the factor loading of a fund on SMB is in the top (bottom) 30%, this fund is classified as small (large) fund. If the magnitude of the factor loading of a fund on HML is in the top (bottom) 30%, this fund is classified as value (growth) fund. If the magnitude of the factor loading of a fund on term spread is in the top (bottom) 30%, this fund is classified as business sensitive (insensitive) fund. If the magnitude of the factor loading of a fund on default spread is in the top (bottom) 30%, this fund is classified as high (low) credit risk fund. Of course, one fund can be classified into multiple funds. If the factor loading of a factor falls between top 30% and bottom 30%, this fund is not classified. The main results of this study are as follows: First, we confirm that the Fama-French 5-factor model shows the best goodness of fit and the lowest tracking errors for Korean equity mutual funds among many factor models considered, such as the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the Fama-French (1993) three-factor model, and Carhart (1997) four-factor model. To compare the performance of the factor models, we estimated the models by observing the year-by-year rolling over for the three-year period for its monthly returns. We also find that the two bond factors are important for better understanding the performance of Korean mutual funds. In particular, since fund performance is affected by business cycles, the use of the bond factors would be essential in analyzing fund performance. Further, the bond factors are good proxies for business cycle. In fact, we confirm that mutual funds returns in Korea are significantly positively correlated with the Korea business-leading indicator and are sensitive to business cycles, which are also determined by the same indicator. Another important finding is that large and growth funds, rather than small, value funds, perform better and take more fund inflows in Korea. Also, Korean mutual fund managers tend to build their investment strategies toward value, large, business cycle-and creditsensitive fund styles. Fourth, only fund managers of a fraction of mutual funds show significant selection ability while most fund managers rarely show market timing ability. For some fund managers equipped with market timing ability, their market timing ability tends to be higher during the recent financial crisis (2007~2009) than during the other times. To analyze the market timing ability of fund managers, we use the conditional model on macroeconomic variables by following Ferson and Schadt (1996) to adjust for time-varying of the factor loadings. Fifth, while only a fraction of mutual funds show positive abnormal returns, they are shown to last just briefly. Rather, low performance (i.e., negative abnormal returns) tends to be strongly persistent. These results are somewhat consistent with the performance of U.S. mutual funds. Among the funds showing positive abnormal returns, growth and large funds show stronger persistence of good performance than do value and small funds. This result implies that the persistency of fund style could be related to good fund performance. Finally, there also exists in Korea the smart money effect, indicating that investors have an ability to identify superior fund managers and invest accordingly; this attests to the fact that fund inflows improve fund performance. Our study indicates, however, that this effect lasts only for three years.
Fund Style,Fama-French Five-Factor Model,Abnormal Returns,Persistency of Fund Performance,Smart Money Effect